Fuel barge explosions underscore risks of fuel transportation

Alabama's fuel barge explosions were nothing more than an unfortunate accident, reports suggest. But the fuel barge explosions serve as a reminder that the distribution of often volatile energy resources comes with certain risks.

By David J. Unger,?Correspondent / April 26, 2013

A massive explosion on one of the two barges on the Mobile River in Mobile, Ala., early Thursday morning. The fuel barge explosions come in the wake of a major oil pipeline spill in Arkansas and a longstanding debate over whether to transport heavy crude oil from Canadian tar sands.

John David Mercer/AP

Enlarge

Early reports suggest Wednesday's fuel barge explosions on the Mobile River in Alabama were an unfortunate accident, probably the result of a spark?igniting?a buildup of unrefined gasoline vapors.

Skip to next paragraph

Why It Matters

Energy: Fossil-fuel energy requires the transportation of large amounts of volatile fuels through a distribution network.

Environment: Although rare, fuel transportation spills have significant impacts on local water and air supplies.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Subscribe Today to the Monitor

Click Here for your FREE 30 DAYS of
The Christian Science Monitor
Weekly Digital Edition

But the incident, which injured three people, refocuses attention on America's aging ? and sometimes fragile ? energy infrastructure. Coming on the heels of an oil pipeline spill in Arkansas and in the middle of a vociferous debate over whether to build a US pipeline for heavy crude oil from Canadian tar sands (also known as oil sands), it brings into question whether the system is up to the task of transporting the nation's newly growing energy wealth.

What are the safest means for transporting the large quantities of oil, natural gas, and gasoline we consume everyday? Do new forms of "unconventional" fuels require a new way of thinking about how we distribute those fuels??Is our energy distribution network capable of meeting today's demand?

"If we're going to integrate new sources of energy into our grid, and move towards energy purity where we?re not beholden to foreign sources, we?re going to have to invest in infrastructure," said John Pappas, interim director of?Texas A&M University's Energy Institute in College Station. "I think everyone realizes that."?

The American Society of Civil Engineers awarded the nation's energy infrastructure a grade of D plus in their 2013 Report Card on America's Infrastructure, released last month. The country's inland waterways system fared even worse, earning a D minus from the trade association.?

"Our nation?s inland waterways and rivers are the hidden backbone of our freight network ? they carry the equivalent of about 51 million truck trips each year," the report reads. "In many cases, the inland waterways system has not been updated since the 1950s, and more than half of the locks are over 50 years old."

The barges involved in the Alabama explosions, which carried on into early Thursday morning, were used to transport natural gasoline (unrefined automotive gasoline, not to be confused with natural gas or liquefied natural gas), but officials said they were empty and being cleaned at the time of the explosions.?

A cursory review of the US Coast Guard's database of incident investigations suggests these kinds of events are rare. There were 44 incidents involving tank barges over the past year, according to the database. They range from minor personnel injuries to crashes involving the discharge of oil. Among the recent events:

In January, an oil barge on the Mississippi River crashed into a railroad bridge spilling as much as 7,000 gallons of crude and temporarily closing a portion of the river. That was slightly less than a year after an oil barge spilled less than 10,000 gallons of oil into the Mississippi. In 2008, a fuel barge crash dumped 283,000 gallons of heavy crude into the Mississippi and closed the river for six days.

"As we continue to use liquid fuels, they are going to be have to be transported," said Clifford Singer, a?co-director of the?University of Illinois'?initiative in Energy and Sustainability Engineering in Urbana.?

Even a switch to cleaner biofuels carries consequences. Because current pipelines do not support ethanol, Mr. Singer said, it is transported along the nation's roads and highways.

"It requires a lot of truck traffic and that constitutes a hazard," he said, "but people probably don't even notice that they?re connected to energy." ??

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/asqtF9wFGBQ/Fuel-barge-explosions-underscore-risks-of-fuel-transportation

Dumpster Diaper the beach Fear Airport Terminal easter bunny easter