Saturday, March 10, 2012

Jim Jones: Legal Troubles & Chrissy Pregnancy Rumors

Dipset's capo, Jim Jones, recently sat down with radio host Q Deezy in Philly to discuss all the crazy things that have been happening with him lately.? Jim talks briefly about ending up behind bars in a cold cell two times within a three day period, his relationship with Chrissy and her pregnancy rumors.

When asked about his relationship and recent engagement to Love & Hip Hop co-star, Chrissy Lampkin, Jim said, "It's going good. It's lovey life. I can't complain. My family is happy. My son is happy, you know."

Regarding the pregnancy rumors, and if they might want children in the near or far off future:

"Not as yet. Soon. I know there have been a lot of rumors. But that is just what they are, rumors."

Regarding his two recent arrests, one for brawling inside of a casino, the other for driving with a suspended license:

"I've had a interesting, fun-filled week. I know I been on the news, I know y'all seen. We'll get through the couple of legal battles...I apologize to the people who came out to see me perform. Life is a gamble!"

Source: http://www.vladtv.com/blog/90707/jim-jones-legal-troubles-chrissy-pregnancy-rumors/

how to make it in america how to make it in america schweddy balls schweddy balls bill conlin kendall jenner plane crash

Friday, March 9, 2012

Did the coalition cancel International Women's Day? | Progress ...

Women working

It?s International Women?s Day on 8 March ? a time to celebrate progress toward economic and political gender equality. Or that?s the aspiration at least.

However, there?s bad news for British women I?m afraid. In the UK the current picture is bleak for gender equality and it seems as if Tory-led governments, economic gloom and gender equality are in some way intrinsically linked.

Let?s look at the evidence for this. The coalition?s cuts to child tax credit, childcare tax credit, child benefit, childcare vouchers and sure start centres all hit women hard ? and these benefits and services are crucial to enable many women to remain in work and build their careers. And female unemployment is now at its highest since the Thatcher years.

So what?s happened? Is this the result of an ideological problem with gender equality in the Tory-led coalition government, or simply the collateral damage of deficit reduction, as they claim? This may be an imponderable, but what we do know is that our last Labour government, during a period of strong economic activity, brought increased gender equality, rights and opportunities to women across the board. So it makes you wonder whether female equality can be viewed as some sort of economic and political weathervane?

However, there is no mistaking that the coalition government doesn?t seem to recognise the impact on gender equality of their cuts. And its stance on women in leadership positions is that women must get there on their own merits, without quotas, no matter how long it takes. Equality is not an end in itself, they seem to suggest ? as ever, the market must decide.

These points are the heart of the Tory blind-spot on women, because they fail to recognise two fundamental truths. First, that gender bias and workplace culture, if left unchanged, will continue to make it difficult for women to achieve gender equality in pay, potential and satisfaction in the workplace for many decades to come.? And second, that in order for women to really have a chance at equality in the workplace we must do more, not less, to support the costs of childcare.

Liam Byrne and Stephen Twigg are right to prioritise childcare at the heart of a new vision for Labour. We have led the way on this issue in the past, increasing tax credits to cover up to 80 per cent of childcare costs, with free nurseries for three- and four-year-olds and 3,500 sure start children?s centres. And we would do well for women, for working families and for the economy to lead the way again.

Childcare costs are rising inexorably year on year and, under the coalition government, public financial support for childcare will continue to decrease.? Independent research has shown that dual-earner families in the UK now spend a shocking 27 per cent of their income on childcare (the second highest figure in OECD countries). And for many the costs of formal childcare have simply become unaffordable ? 33,000 women alone were forced out of jobs this year because of rises in childcare costs and the lowering of public financial support.? And the picture is set to get much worse. This dangerous trend is now applying an ever-increasing pressure on household incomes as well as gender equality.

My preferred policy would be a bold one: the provision of universal childcare is in my view the single most aspirational policy we could offer women ? and hard working families ? for the future. OK, it would be controversial and yes, it would be expensive ? or would it? According to an IPPR report published in December, new cost-benefit analysis shows that universal childcare would pay a return to the government of ?20,050 (over four years) in terms of tax revenue minus the cost of childcare for every woman who returns to full-time employment after one year of maternity leave. And what would that return be across the next 20 years of each woman?s career? Keeping both parents in work gives them more spending power as well as resilience to cope with economic downturns. Enable a woman to stay in her career and she will continue to increase her earnings, her tax contributions and her family?s spending power.

A bold policy such as this could reverse the fortunes of many women and hard-working families ? as well as make economic sense for the country.

?????????????????????????????

Victoria Powell is a Labour party activist from Hornsey and Wood Green CLP, and a member of the Labour party future candidates programme. She is an award-winning TV producer and founder of a successful TV company.

?????????????????????????????

Photo: .DesertMonsterBell


childcare, coalition government, equalities, ippr, Labour, Liam Byrne, OECD, Stephen Twigg, universal childcare, Women

Source: http://www.progressonline.org.uk/2012/03/08/did-the-coalition-cancel-international-women%E2%80%99s-day/

post office hours post office hours coptic coptic breaking bad season finale breaking bad season finale jets patriots

Thursday, March 8, 2012

What To Do When Charged With Identity Theft Crime | Identity Theft

Identification theft can be a serious prison offense; it?s an act of fraud often achieved for illegal actions or entry resources below a stolen identity. At occasions, an individual who?s charged with identification theft is the sufferer of the said crime. Funds and advantages acquired on the time of the crime are usually held in opposition to the person accused by the ruling court.

To help you avoid from being wrongfully accused, it is advised that you repeatedly check the movement of your finances. In the event you see an irregularity in your financial accounts, cancel your accounts immediately and report the suspicious activity.

Nonetheless, in case your finances are already compromised, it is time that you simply search counsel from an identity theft lawyer that will help you clean your name. Id theft legal professionals will look at every info and occasions to prove that you?ve been a sufferer of stolen identity and it was not you who committed but someone else under your name.

Without legal representation, it may be difficult to scrub your data; there are such a lot of rules, formalities that you must undergo to prove that you?re innocent of the crime. Id theft lawyers will characterize you and enable you to find justice.

In some states, identity theft lawyers work otherwise as there are various ruling in a single jurisdiction. For this reason it is crucial that a person needs to be represented rightfully in court docket and assist you discover your approach within the legal justice to defend you from unfair prosecution.

Id theft attorneys may also help in case your credit score has been affected as a consequence of fraudulent activities performed in your name. It is best to ask away questions from the lawyer about his plans on serving to your case, and explain to you in a comprehensible way.

Facing ID theft could be a painful and insulting expertise and no person should face it alone. By looking for help from a specializing lawyer, cleaning your title and proving you are harmless will get you through this tough time. All paperwork and legwork will likely be dealt with and of course, together with your full cooperation all the pieces will be in its own place again.

For those who find that, there is suspicious exercise occurring beneath your title, instantly name for help from a trustworthy lawyer. Know your rights and absolutely cooperate with the proceedings.Dealing with ID theft can be a painful and insulting experience and no one should face it alone. By in search of assist from a specializing legal professional, cleansing your title and proving you are harmless will get you thru this tough time. All paperwork and legwork might be handled and of course, along with your full cooperation everything shall be in its personal place again.

In case you discover that, there?s suspicious activity happening underneath your name, instantly name for assist from a reliable lawyer. Know your rights and fully cooperate with the proceedings.

This post is written by Timothy Boyd, he is a web enthusiast and ingenious blogger who loves to write about many different topics, such as overwhelming experience. His educational background in journalism and family science has given him a broad base from which to approach many topics save overstockand many others. He enjoys experimenting with various techniques and topics like right muscle and has a love for creativity. He has a really strong passion for scouring the internet in search of ?inspirational topics.

Related posts:

  1. What To Do When Charged With Identity Theft Crime
  2. The Crime Of Identity Theft
  3. Identity Theft Is A Crime, But You Are The Victim
  4. Identity Theft Is A Crime, But You Are The Victim
  5. Identity Theft ? The Fastest Growing Crime Wave In America!

Source: http://marcomolaro.com/what-to-do-when-charged-with-identity-theft-crime-2/

advent calendar adobe air 2005yu55 advanced search alexander the great personhood amendment haynesworth

KiMo to Host ?The Raven? Art Exhibition March 1st ? 25th | abqARTS ...

Albuquerque ARTS

"The Raven" Art Exhibition. Photo by Augustine Romero.

On Thursday, March 1st a special art exhibition will open at the KiMo Theatre Gallery that pays tribute to Edgar Allan Poe?s famous poem. In the fall of 2011, 18 local artists were commissioned to create works for an exhibit titled ?The Raven.? Each work of art contributed to the show interprets one stanza of The Raven, and will be hung in actual poetic sequence.

?When viewing the sequence of art works, one can experience the mastery of both the visual artists and of Edgar Allan Poe,? stated Augustine Romero, Art Curator of the KiMo Theatre and South Broadway Cultural Center.

The show premiered at the Main Library in the fall of 2011 as part of The Big Read, a program of the National Endowment for the Arts designed to restore reading to the center of American culture. The Big Read brings together partners across the country to encourage reading for pleasure and enlightenment. Poe?s works were the subject of last fall?s program.

A Silent Auction of the 18 works will be held on March 1st, with bidding open until 7 p.m. The bid winners will be announced at 7:15 p.m. during a free public reception for the artists that is scheduled from 6 ? 8 p.m. at the KiMo Art Gallery. Monies?raised will go to the Friends for the Public Library.

The Artists whose works are included in this exhibit are: Eason Eige, Marcellin Simard, Jude Pacheco, Jeremy Montoya, Amy J. Clisner, John Bicknell, Adrian Panaro, Regina Araujo Corritore, Henry Morales, Benjamin Roe, Derrick Montez, Justine Ortiz, Travis Black, Stacy Hawkinson, Jon Sanchez, Shawn Turung, Andres Orlowski, and Alan Paine Radebaugh.? The exhibition was curated by Augustine Romero.

The KiMo Gallery is open during normal hours of operation of the KiMo Theatre (Wednesday ? Saturday 11 a.m. ? 8 p.m.; Sunday 11 a.m. ? 3 p.m.) and during most KiMo events. During the day visitors are requested to enter at the KiMo?s Business Office at 423 Central Avenue NW (corner of 5th and Central) where they will be directed to the gallery to view and enjoy the exhibition. For the Artists Reception, visitors may access the gallery through the 417 Central Avenue entry.

?

The KiMo Theatre is operated by the Cultural Services Department, City of Albuquerque, Richard J. Berry, Mayor. The Theatre is centrally located at 423 Central Avenue NW (corner of 5th and Central) and there is a large parking facility right behind the Theatre at 5th and Copper. Visit KiMoAbq.org?or call 311 for up-to-date information on the wide variety of entertainment options offered at this unique venue. TTY Users call 711.

?

Source: http://abqarts.com/?p=9954

fleet week scarecrow festival scarecrow festival oklahoma state football oklahoma state football case mccoy case mccoy

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Getting More Done in Less Time ? Growing Your Online Business ...

If you are not comfortable with internet business and executing quick and important decisions, then it is critical that you know that ability is indispensable with online marketing and business. So many speed bumps are encountered just as soon as a person decides to thrown their hat in the ring.

Most Internet marketers have only one aim: to help their businesses get set up on auto-pilot so that they don?t have to spend as much time working but still being able to get the same end result. In the beginning, setting up a web business is much harder than it looks because you have to tend to all of the little details yourself. This is when having good time management skills is most important because if you get more done in less time, you will have more time to work on your strategies and plans.

Time management is one of the most difficult issues that face Internet marketers these days because they face an always growing number of tasks that they need to accomplish and there isn?t ever enough time. There are new marketing strategies coming out every single day and the competition is always growing and that can make your life as an Internet marketer immeasurably difficult and sometimes even confusing. So what?s the solution to this problem? It?s not that hard; you need to focus on the things that allow you to achieve more in even less time so that you can get as much from your work without having to truly worry about any of the results.

One of the first things you should always think about as you are discovering a new marketing method is how it can work with your business. We do not have uses for some marketing strategies, but we do like weddings in the lake district marketing strategy approach in some of our own marketing funnels. However, as strange as it may sound not all marketers want to take their businesses to higher levels of performance. On the other hand, it does seem in our experience that most businesses want to do more. Ask your self what you can do with this, and then seek to possibly integrate with any of your present campaigns. Also, remember there is nothing wrong with testing and trying something new, and that is really the only intelligent approach to expansion. Familiarize yourself with online apps that will help you raise your productivity while also lowering the load of work you have to do yourself. There are so many web based tools that don?t cost anything and can help you get so much more done.

Here is something that most Internet Marketers don?t apply very well: ?touch any task at hand just once? which means that when you see something that needs to be done it is time to start doing it. Going through it a lot of times but not taking any real action isn?t all that recommended because it doesn?t serve any actual purpose. For example, as you sort through your email inbox, decide right there and then whether you should reply, delete or archive each letter and do that right then instead of just letting it sit at the back of your mind. The majority of the Internet marketers today are unable to taste real success because they aren?t looking at the issue of time management with serious concern. Procrastination happens to everybody which means that online marketing progress is really slow. When you want to outshine the competition and create a real impact it is very important to focus on doing more with less time. The tactics that we discussed above are perfect for you to get started, so don?t delay taking action on what you just learned.

If you want to get more done in much less time, you will sometimes need a little bit of external help. It is important to know who to ask for help and where to get the right kinds of assistance you need to give you the boost you?re looking for. Once in a while it?s good to figure things out on your own because you can learn from the experience but there are going to be times when you are a lot better off finding help instead of just wasting your own time. Try to make every minute at your workspace productive ? if there?s something you have trouble doing then find someone who can lend a hand, there?s nothing wrong in that.

Chances are more than excellent that internet business has been part of your game plan, but something is still amiss on magazine franchise business strategy. Do not ever think you are the only one. That is exactly why it pays to discover the real truth about internet business and then learn how to use it, properly. Time for you to make a decision and take action, if you are up to the task then go to magazine franchise right now.

Source: http://www.internetmarketersblog.net/2012/03/07/getting-more-done-in-less-time-growing-your-online-business-2/

dakota fanning casey anthony video diary joe johnson lamarcus aldridge jeremy renner sacramento kings portland trail blazers

Dellavedova lifts Saint Mary's in OT 78-74

Gonzaga's Elias Harris goes up for a shot against Saint Mary's in the first half during the NCAA West Coast Conference tournament championship basketball game, Monday, March 5, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

Gonzaga's Elias Harris goes up for a shot against Saint Mary's in the first half during the NCAA West Coast Conference tournament championship basketball game, Monday, March 5, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

Saint Mary's Brad Waldow, left, gets tangled up with Gonzaga's Mike Hart in the first half during the NCAA West Coast Conference tournament championship basketball game, Monday, March 5, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

Saint Mary's Jorden Page, left, passes the ball off against Gonzaga's Elias Harris in the first half during the NCAA West Coast Conference tournament championship basketball game, Monday, March 5, 2012, in Las Vegas. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson)

(AP) ? With the score deadlocked in overtime and the ball bouncing free, opposing guards Matthew Dellavedova and Kevin Pangos collided near the scorer's table.

The guy who grew up around Aussie Rules Football made sure he got there first, and it proved critical as Saint Mary's pulled out a 78-74 OT victory Monday night over Gonzaga in the West Coast Conference tournament championship.

"I was trying to get my body in front of it," said Dellavedova, who led the Gaels with 22 points. "It goes back to Australia Rules footy. I was pretty happy they called the foul on him, but I guess it could have gone either way."

Dellavedova would get the call and sink the free throws, and later add two more to secure the win over No. 24 Gonzaga and an NCAA bid.

It was Saint Mary's second WCC tourney title in three years. But it was the first time the Gaels (27-5) have won the regular-season title outright and claimed the tourney championship the same year.

"I'm just a bit relieved that we finally got it done," Dellavedova said. "We'll enjoy this but once we get back (to California), we're going to focus, work hard again to get ready for the (NCAA) tourney because we want to do some things there."

The Bulldogs, despite some big wins and a 25-6 overall record, will have to wait for the selection committee to find out if they'll make the NCAA field.

"It was a great ball game, two high-level tournament teams going at it and battling," Gonzaga coach Mark Few said. "Forty minutes wasn't enough so we needed another five, and in the end they stepped up and made big shots."

Elias Harris led Gonzaga with 22 points, including a 3-pointer with 2 seconds left in regulation to force the extra period.

Dellavedova, the WCC player of the year, had a chance to win it at the buzzer in regulation but his runner bounced off the rim.

The junior point guard also gets plenty of credit for forcing Pangos into a miserable shooting night, just two days after the WCC newcomer of the year lit up Brigham Young for 30 points.

Pangos finished with seven points on 3-of-18 shooting. He was just 1 of 10 from 3-point range. Center Robert Sacre finished with 17 points for Gonzaga while Sam Dower added 14 off the bench.

"Pangos had a really good night the other night and he hurt us up at Gonzaga," Saint Mary's coach Randy Bennett said of a Feb. 9 loss in which Pangos scored 27 points and hit five 3-pointers.

"He won't go 1 of 10 very often, but Matt did a good job of making him take tough shots."

Saint Mary's also got help from Clint Steindl defending Pangos, and had post players rotate over as well.

Rob Jones was just as valuable for the Gaels, adding 18 points and nine rebounds, while Jorden Page, another Aussie, added 16 points and Brad Waldow had 13 and eight rebounds.

"The stars showed up tonight," Bennett said. "It was fun, a little too exciting down the stretch. ... but I'm really pleased."

He said it was important no one panicked after Harris forced overtime with the huge 3.

"People ask what did we say after they hit that shot? We didn't say anything," Bennett said. "We played good defense and they hit a tough shot. I don't have to coach leadership. The leadership is already there."

Despite having to go another five minutes, Jones said Saint Mary's players knew they were still the tougher team.

"In the end, we got it done," Jones said.

The teams were meeting for the 12th time in four years in a rivalry that is perhaps the fiercest on the West Coast right now.

At least one player called it a "hate-hate" relationship before the game, with Sacre saying it was personal and a matter of pride.

It lived up to its billing.

There were 14 lead changes and nine ties.

Saint Mary's led by as many as eight points early in the second half, but Gonzaga hung tight, pulling within 63-62 on Pangos' only 3-pointer with 3:58 left.

The Gaels still led 68-63 with 31 seconds left, but Harris hit a driving layup with 15 seconds remaining then sank the game-tying 3-pointer.

Both teams had chances to take command in the overtime.

In addition to the collision between Pangos and Dellavadova with 39 seconds left in OT, Page grabbed a key rebound for Saint Mary's then sank two free throws to put the Gaels up 76-72. Dower's layup cut it to two again, but Dellavedova was fouled breaking through Gonzaga's full-court press and converted the free throws for the final margin.

Delly Dazzles read the sign in the crowd.

"He's got it all," Bennett said of Dellavedova, who was born outside Melbourne, Australia, but learned basketball from his father in a Friday night league. "I don't know if I've ever coached a guy's who's as good a leader. He studies it, cares about it. He knows in game like this, he's supposed to step up."

Now it's on to the NCAAs, and Bennett believes a game like Monday's can only help the Gaels.

"We haven't played many close games," Bennett said. "You get confidence playing close games by having success. We probably had 3 all year. ... I think our guys will be even more resilient and tougher and harder to beat."

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-03-06-BKC-WCC-T25-Gonzaga-Saint-Mary's/id-a1a9ec35d33e4af09da5127f558946db

tebowing washington wizards rudy zynga free shipping free shipping esophageal cancer

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Special Report: Santorum's wins, self-inflicted wounds

PITTSBURGH, Pennsylvania (Reuters) - As Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum fought for his political life in 2006, his ally Senator Arlen Specter offered a word of advice: Just stop talking.

What Specter meant was that Santorum should stop talking about social issues, according to Adrienne Baker Green, a Specter aide who witnessed the exchange.

Santorum's outspoken style on issues such as abortion and women in the workplace, which had once made him a star among social conservatives, appeared to be alienating more moderate Pennsylvania voters who would decide his fate in November 2006.

Santorum responded: "I can't stop. Everyone is listening," says Baker Green. Specter says he can't recall the encounter; Santorum's campaign didn't respond to a request for comment.

Santorum lost the 2006 Senate election by 18 percentage points, partly due to a wave of anti-Republican sentiment that year, but also because of his own words, which Democrats used to paint him as too extreme for Pennsylvania voters.

The arc of Santorum's political career in Pennsylvania, where he first won over a Democratic district, then alienated voters, is beginning to look similar to his rise in the 2012 presidential race. With each advance, Santorum's support has been partially undermined by his own controversial remarks. Just days before the Michigan primary, Santorum said President John F. Kennedy's 1960 speech on the separation of church and state made him want to "throw up."

"I wish I had that particular line back," he later said.

Santorum often portrays himself as a champion of the blue-collar voter whose experience winning rough-and-tumble elections in Pennsylvania shows he can attract moderates and independents.

A look at his five races in Pennsylvania reveals a candidate who thrives in the role of underdog and fighter. A hard-working door-to-door campaigner, he energized his conservative and evangelical base and won over blue-collar voters by securing federal funds that brought construction jobs.

Santorum also benefited from weak Democratic opponents and national trends that dovetailed with his anti-tax and pro-life message.

Pennsylvanians who worked on those campaigns recall his off-the-cuff style as well as his love of question-and-answer sessions in which he would eagerly talk about a broad range of issues. His advisers say he often came up with the topics of his speeches on the way to the venue.

Republicans in the Keystone State also recall a man who wouldn't back down in an argument; often coming across as brash, abrasive and unscripted.

"Every so often, Rick throws the pass you don't need to throw, to use a football analogy. And he threw a couple he didn't need to throw," says Alan Novak, a former Republican Party leader in Pennsylvania who is supporting former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney for the GOP nomination.

"I always call them unforced errors."

Graphic showing Santorum's campaigns: http://link.reuters.com/jaw86s

Video on Santorum's focus heading into Ohio race: http://link.reuters.com/tyv86s

PENNSYLVANIA'S KEYSTONES

Political consultant James Carville famously described Pennsylvania as Philadelphia and Pittsburgh "with Alabama in between." Political operatives there count at least three, and as many as six, mini-states within the state of various political stripes. Pennsylvania has backed the Democratic candidate for president in every race since 1992, while voters tend to be more conservative in statewide races.

In 1990, Rick Santorum, then a 32-year-old attorney, set his sights on a U.S. congressional seat that had been held by Democrat Doug Walgren for 14 years.

Santorum's political experience up to that point consisted of working as chief of staff for a moderate, pro-choice state senator, Doyle Corman. Republican leaders and friends tried to persuade Santorum to run instead for a relatively safe Pennsylvania house seat in Harrisburg.

Santorum wouldn't hear of it. He told friends that Walgren was too liberal for the district and that a conservative could win.

Keith Schmidt, who has worked on all of Santorum's campaigns and is now an adviser on his presidential bid, says one of Santorum's best political weapons is his intuition. "He just saw an opportunity that I can safely say no one saw that year."

Santorum went all in. He quit his job and convinced his soon-to-be wife to quit hers and hit the campaign trail.

"We all told him he was crazy," said State Senator Jake Corman, who took over his father's seat after Doyle Corman retired from politics. But Santorum, he said, is fiercely competitive by nature, "from board games to public policy."

Ron Klink, a Pittsburgh television reporter who would later go into politics as a Democrat and would lose the 2000 Senate race to Santorum, remembers Santorum standing on a bridge leading into downtown Pittsburgh, waving his campaign sign at passing cars.

"We referred to him as the Goof on the Bridge," Klink says.

Schmidt says Santorum was involved in all aspects of campaigning. Santorum's friends and foes alike agree he is a natural retail campaigner. He wore out three pairs of shoes criss-crossing the congressional district, says Schmidt.

"He personally hit 20,000 doors. That's just so ridiculous," he adds. Santorum would often follow up with a hand-written note to voters he had met that day, Schmidt says.

Santorum had a simple message: The incumbent, Walgren, was out of touch with his district because he lived in the Washington area rather than in Pennsylvania. Santorum's slogan was "Leadership in Touch With You."

"There were no warning signs at all. We could not find him in polling at the beginning of September," Walgren says. "Our experience was he was able to leaflet very broadly, essentially knocking on doors, with young pro-life people. Pro-life was really gathering steam ... and I was clearly pro-choice."

Santorum ended up winning the district with just over 51 percent of the vote.

'THE BEST UNDERDOG'

His next victory -- winning re-election in 1992 -- owed a lot to Democratic Party's own troubles, Schmidt says. Two years later, with the district looking likely to turn Democratic in 1994, Schmidt says, Santorum turned his sights on a Senate seat.

Santorum was back in his element as the underdog. At town-hall meetings that year, he would tell voters that putting Santorum bumper stickers on their cars was worth as much as a $500 donation to his campaign.

Santorum packed his wife and young family into an RV and drove across the state to introduce himself to voters, remembers Becky Corman, the wife of his old boss, State Senator Doyle Corman, and Santorum's 1994 grassroots coordinator.

"I have youth on my side," Schmidt recalls Santorum telling his campaign staff. "You can schedule me long hours, I'll give six speeches a day. I want to meet people."

Santorum's Democratic opponent that year was Harris Wofford, a former president of Bryn Mawr College and a founder of the Peace Corps. Democratic strategists remember Wofford as a reluctant campaigner, uncomfortable with going on the offensive, even as Santorum hammered him for supporting gun control.

Republican voters, especially pro-life evangelicals who had not been active in previous races, hosted fundraisers in their homes, said Novak, the former Pennsylvania GOP leader. The crowds grew.

"He's the best underdog you ever saw," says Novak. "He seems to derive his energy from always having a hill to climb."

The Republican Revolution was sweeping the country. In Pennsylvania, turnout among conservatives surged. They made up 40 percent of voters in 1994, compared with 26 percent in 1992.

Santorum beat Wofford 49 to 47 percent, with the Christian Coalition and the gun lobby among his most enthusiastic supporters. Among moderates, Santorum trailed Wofford by 15 percentage points.

Six years later, Santorum faced Representative Ron Klink for the Senate seat. Klink had heard Santorum had a temper and hoped to get under his skin during the debates.

"Having been a hard-nosed reporter, and having been in Congress ... I was absolutely positive, excuse my French, that I could piss off Rick Santorum and could really get him off of his center," Klink says. "We had six debates. And I couldn't get to him. I couldn't get him to lose his cool."

Santorum was ready. As part of his debate preparation, Schmidt and Santorum's other advisers would have the candidate stand in front of a mirror, while they took shots at him.

"We would say the awfullest things to him and just get him off his mark - mean-spirited things - literally interrupt him a few times," Schmidt says.

WASHINGTON INSIDER

Following his victory in 2000, and with George W. Bush in the White House, Santorum rose to become the Republican majority's third-ranking official. He was among the Senate's most passionate defenders of the Iraq War.

But as his profile rose nationally, trouble was brewing in Pennsylvania.

As the 2006 election approached, Bush's popularity was reaching its nadir. Santorum's support for the Iraq War was coming back to haunt him in his core constituencies.

Santorum's Democratic opponent that year, Bob Casey Jr., was a pro-life, pro-gun moderate who had the same name as his father -- a popular former Pennsylvania governor.

"In 2006, we were doubly blessed -- we could run against George W. Bush and Rick Santorum," says Democratic strategist Mary Isenhour, who helped run Casey's campaign in 2006.

Santorum was also losing the women's vote.

At dinner parties attended by Republicans that fall, Novak, the former party official, remembers being struck by how many women said they were not planning to support the senator.

Part of the problem was Santorum's memoir, "It Takes A Family." Against the advice of several longtime supporters, Santorum published the book the year before the election.

In it, Santorum decried "radical feminism's misogynistic crusade to make working outside the home the only marker of social value and self-respect." The line has come back to haunt Santorum on the presidential trail. He said recently that his wife, Karen, wrote that passage.

Santorum was also taking heat for comments he made in a 2003 interview with the Associated Press in which he appeared to liken homosexual sex to "man on dog." Santorum has been asked about the comment repeatedly, and has never denied saying it.

"Nobody could believe he had actually said this," says Isenhour, the Democratic strategist. "That was about as extreme as we'd ever heard from him, and then it kept getting worse."

There was also a charge of hypocrisy. In 1990, Santorum won against Walgren in large part by portraying his opponent as a Washington insider who didn't live in the district. By 2006, Santorum had moved his family to McLean, Virginia, where he was charging his Pennsylvania school district for his children's education.

By July, with his poll numbers not moving, Santorum's campaign met with a group of fiscal conservative grassroots activists. The group had backed the conservative Pat Toomey over the more moderate Specter in the 2004 Republican primary for one of Pennsylvania's U.S. Senate seats. They were still furious over Santorum's endorsement of Specter, who was known disdainfully as a "King of Pork." Specter would go on to win the election and then switch to the Democratic Party.

The group felt that Santorum had fallen out of touch with the small-government direction of the party. He, too, had gained fame for his ability to bring home the bacon to his Pennsylvania constituents. He had supported an increase in the minimum wage and government programs like No Child Left Behind, a federal program that emphasizes testing and performance standards in schools.

The meeting with the activists, most of them in their mid-20s, had been meant as a reconciliation. Several in attendance challenged Santorum on his support of deficit spending and earmarks. The gathering devolved into a profanity-peppered shouting match, say several people who were present.

"We walked in there, ready to reconcile, and we were just berated," says Jason High, a conservative political activist. "It was not pretty ... Rick just yelled and screamed at us."

Bob Guzzardi, a real-estate developer who says he gave about $30,000 to the Santorum campaign that year, left the meeting, which dragged on more than 90 minutes, feeling "blown off."

Ryan Shafik, a Toomey campaign aide who had interned with Santorum in 2000 but had fallen out with the senator, remembers Santorum taking an imperious tone at the meeting. "'The conservative movement in Pennsylvania starts and ends with me,'" he recalls the senator saying.

Santorum's campaign manager, Vince Galko, set up the meeting. He denies there was shouting and says that most of those in attendance remained supportive of Santorum's campaign.

"The fact is that Rick went in there, showed how hard he was willing to fight for every vote and was willing to listen to all sides," says Galko. "Their intent was, 'You've got to come more to the right.' His point - 'I'm losing this race because people think I'm too far to the right.'"

"Keep this in context - you have the third-ranking member of the United States Senate who's in the fight of his life in an election year, coming to Harrisburg to meet with these folks, he wasn't going in there to yell at them," says Galko. "He was going in there to work with them and enlist their support."

Santorum lost the 2006 race in a landslide. Nearly six in 10 voters backed Casey, including 61 percent of female voters, according to CNN exit polls.

The only voting groups he was able to win convincingly were his base - evangelical and born-again Christians, voters who oppose abortion in all cases, and conservatives who approved of George W. Bush's presidency, the exit polls showed.

"We were no great geniuses for taking him out," says T.J. Rooney, a Democratic campaign consultant and a former chairman of the Pennsylvania Democratic Committee. "He was out there shooting his mouth off. He obviously doesn't take direction very well."

Jake Corman says the defeat wasn't Santorum's fault: "In 2006, people were ready to fire Republicans."

Today, some GOP campaign managers in Pennsylvania worry that if Santorum wins the nomination, having him atop the ticket could hurt Pennsylvania Republicans in statewide races. Shafik, the Toomey campaign aide, says it could amount to a "Rickpocalypse."

"The thing that Republican officials will not say publicly, but are saying privately, is that they fear that with Rick Santorum at the top of the ticket there's going to be a blood bath" for Republicans, says Shafik.

Schmidt, still one of Santorum's closest aides, said the campaign is betting that just as Santorum and his politics were out of fashion in 2006, nationally they are back in fashion in 2012.

As a precedent, he cites 1994 when Santorum cast himself as the unapologetic conservative against Wofford, the unapologetic liberal. This year, it would be conservative Santorum versus liberal Obama.

"The fact that the president believes in a liberal agenda and has articulated it well we're going to articulate a conservative agenda," says Schmidt. "And we'll have to see where the middle breaks."

(Reporting By Kristina Cooke and Edith Honan)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/special-report-santorums-wins-self-inflicted-wounds-022411134.html

super committee walmart black friday ad 2011 nl mvp nl mvp verlander verlander justin verlander